With a truly global perspective, this vivid and readable narrative provides a comprehensive overview of the history of electronic music. The author draws upon his combined experience as composer, performer, researcher, entrepreneur, and teacher to provide insight into every aspect of electronic music, including the music itself, the instruments, and the business.

Based With a truly global perspective, this vivid and readable narrative provides a comprehensive overview of the history of electronic music. The author draws upon his combined experience as composer, performer, researcher, entrepreneur, and teacher to provide insight into every aspect of electronic music, including the music itself, the instruments, and the business. Based on more than 150 interviews with leaders in the field, this book allows readers to understand how and why the musicians, engineers and businessmen did what they did to develop the modern synthesizer to its current state. It's been around 12 years since I read this and I still think about it today. This was part of my introduction to electronic music and I loved every second of it. The office season 1 torrent.

Couldn't put it down. Maybe it's proof that when you become interested in a subject it can consume you and you can't get enough information. But I loved how it started from the beginnings of electric sound, and I was captivated by the early inventions. From there Chadabe followed the evolution of hardware and composers. Another surpri It's been around 12 years since I read this and I still think about it today.

The Csound Book: Perspectives in Software Synthesis, Sound Design, Signal. Electric Sound: The Past and Promise of Electronic Music.

This was part of my introduction to electronic music and I loved every second of it. Couldn't put it down. Maybe it's proof that when you become interested in a subject it can consume you and you can't get enough information. But I loved how it started from the beginnings of electric sound, and I was captivated by the early inventions. From there Chadabe followed the evolution of hardware and composers.

Another surprise I learned about with this book is 20th century composers and their roots. Programma microsoft equation 30. Even ones that didn't use electronics in their compositions. This book is incredibly comprehensive. My cousin gave me this book when I visited him in the Netherlands where he was studying electric sound, and this book was used as a textbook, so maybe some people will find the content dry and academic. But it is definitely the first textbook I've ever read completely, cover to cover. If you are really into analog music synthesis, you'll have to read this book at some point. The reason i didn't give it more stars was because half of the book is a really dry history of computer music and pre-synth music.

When that happens you learn about a bunch of white men playing with computers and or merely parts of a future synth. Not one of the musical pieces made at that time is still popular, although they might serve as an interesting footnote. It was cool to read about Stockhausen's if you are really into analog music synthesis, you'll have to read this book at some point. The reason i didn't give it more stars was because half of the book is a really dry history of computer music and pre-synth music. When that happens you learn about a bunch of white men playing with computers and or merely parts of a future synth. Not one of the musical pieces made at that time is still popular, although they might serve as an interesting footnote.

It was cool to read about Stockhausen's techniques and to learn a lot about Thaddeus Cahill's Telharmonium but most of the pre-synth stories are remarkably boring and the computer music chapter is a total snooze fest. All the photos are horribly printed - you'd think they would have scanned the pictures, but no, they HAD to zerox the pics so there is barely any detail and there's a nasty moire pattern on many of them that could have been removed in 3 seconds if they weren't xeroxed. What's up with that? It's common knowledge that that the Buchla 200 wasn't available until 1970, so why does the author, who knows better, put a pic of a 200 in the book on p. 149 and label it as late 1960's? In the late 60's Buchla was making the Model 100 which is still considered Buchla's finest creation (ask Buchla expert Phil Corocco - and Vincent Gallo too). So why show a picture of a marginal 200 and mislabel it when you could have included a pic of the Model 100 which sounds much better AND it was built as the description says, in the late 60's?